top of page
River.jpeg

Spain & the UK | Baseline Total Economic Value | Status: Completed April 2026

Value of Nature: The Investment Case for Nature-based Solutions

Nature loss is emerging as a systemic economic and financial risk, undermining the Ecosystem Services (ES) that underpin productivity, resilience, and human well-being. Despite growing policy ambition, particularly under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and EU Nature Restoration Law, current financial and economic systems continue to undervalue nature, resulting in underinvestment in nature-based solutions (NbS).

 

This report addresses a central challenge of how to translate the broad societal value of NbS into actionable financial logic that can mobilize investment at scale. Commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Food Security and Nature (LVVN), this study examines how Ecosystem Service Valuation (ESV) can support the scaling of finance for NbS. It demonstrates that ESV is a strategic tool to clarify value creation, reveal the distribution of costs and benefits across stakeholders, and inform the design of financial mechanisms and Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs).

 

The analysis combines literature review, expert interviews, and two in-depth case studies: a landscape-scale reforestation initiative in the United Kingdom (Avon Needs Trees) and a regenerative agriculture transition in Spain (El Roble Farm). Across both cases, the findings show that NbS generate substantial increases in Total Economic Value (TEV), primarily driven by regulating and cultural ES such as climate regulation, water management, biodiversity, and recreation.

 

These benefits are often widely distributed across society and accrue over long time horizons, while costs remain concentrated among a limited number of actors. This structural mismatch between value creation and financial capture explains why NbS remain underfinanced despite their strong societal returns. Conventional appraisal frameworks prioritize short-term, monetized cash flows and systematically underrepresent non-market benefits, creating a bias in favor of grey infrastructure alternatives. ESV addresses this gap by making the full bundle of ES visible and comparable, enabling more informed and equitable decision-making.

 


 

Problems & Solutions

The study also identifies further key barriers to scaling NbS finance. These include fragmented methodologies, lack of standardized metrics, limited data availability, and insufficient integration of ESV into financial and policy frameworks. Without a shared valuation language, NbS struggle to gain credibility and comparability in investment contexts. PPPs emerge as a critical mechanism to address these challenges.

 

The report shows that ESV can serve as a common evidence base within PPPs, informing three core design dimensions.  By clarifying who benefits from which services, ESV supports more proportionate and transparent allocation of financial responsibilities.

Capital Design

Aligning funding contributions with value distribution

Value Recognition

Governance Alignment

Integrating ES into financial decision-making

Ensuring enabling policy and institutional frameworks

bottom of page